Meine Kuh ist eine ehrbare Kuh. Und wenn jemand etwas anderes behauptet, dann störte sie das auch nicht, denn meine Kuh braucht zu ihrem Glück saftige Weiden und nicht die Ehrerbietung irgendwelcher Leute. Meine Kuh meint, Ehre wäre ziemlicher Unfug.
Meine Kuh steht mit ihrer Auffassung zum Ehrbegriff nicht allein da. Bert Steffens beispielsweise hat im Saar-Echo am 17.04.2006 einen Artikel Würde & Ehre - Knetmasse für Richter veröffentlicht und sich mit der Geschichte der Ehre als einem leeren Wahn beschäftigt:
"Zum Begriff der ”Ehre, meinte der Jurist Karl Ferdinand Hommel in seiner 1778 heraus gegebenen Übersetzung von Beccarias Werk ”Dei "." Delitti e delle pene ", if it were" imaginary estate "to an" empty delusion
also Arthur Schopenhauer recognized many years ago, the irrationality of the concept of honor and put it this way:
"The honor objective, the opinions of others of our value and, subjectively, our fear of this opinion. "
I just wanted to take my happy cow grazing in a lush, as I hear from Germany already have a history of strife. My cow said to me In Germany there was a fight about the German people oh so cherished honor.
judges in Germany have traditionally been a particularly intimate Relation to values \u200b\u200bsuch as honor and loyalty. Hitler's executioners Roland Freisler example, the prevailing opinion was his life as an honorable man, which was posthumously of course, very differently, defended the slogan " to life, liberty and honor of our people but it depends! " the honor of the German people.
made with troublemakers Freisler and his fellow judges short process, and said to them from the honor. As an example, for example, the trial of Adolf querulous Buchbinder Gerst, who on May 9, 1944 for continued defeatist propaganda on charges of undermining military morale to death for the withdrawal of political rights and to bear the costs was sentenced.
Fortunately, Germany has broken thoroughly to this infamous German traditions. Today, the reading in the German justice very differently. Thus formulated lawyer Dr. Dierk Hartmann of the office of Dr. Hartmann and Dr. Gigerl: 17-01-2007 in support of an application pursuant to § 890 ZPO punishment of the entrepreneur Hans Dieter Große Büning against Rainer Hoffmann, who runs the site with a lot www.solarresearch.org empathy :
. "We therefore not only a two-week, but a lot of weeks in prison for display, it is unacceptable that a troublemaker of justice" dancing around the nose and on at will court judgments . Flouts "
Later in the application turned out to be a lawyer, Dr. Dierk Hartmann as a true expert in the field and lectures:
" In a troublemaker is an exaggerated, in incorrigible conviction suffer in bad way to continually right wrongs. It is an awakening from a combative, stubborn, this sensitive character development that usually begins with a real or perceived legal injury, which may lead to a bitter, often many years of continuous struggle for the supposed right or to endless litigating, until the funds are exhausted. The complainer summarizes all the forces could to repair an injustice ... "are
that the causes of the persistent bickering in of Court in the case of Rainer Hoffmann wrongs committed, the fact that the judge at the Landgericht Bochum Dr. Michael Krökel decided a process wrong Has a law firm partner Dr. Hans-Jochen Gigerl has submitted false facts in order to win the solar entrepreneur Hans Dieter Große Büning the process in defiance of law and the Appellate Body has confirmed this to return to the justiciable misbehavior of first instance under the rug, like Lawyer Dr. Dierk Hartmann not to be considered.
is remarkable the case law in the case Rainer Hoffmann Hans Dieter Große Büning namely against already. How can it be that Judge Michael Krökel instead of the key original advertisement, with Rainer Hoffmann as a customer for a solar installation of the entrepreneur Hans Dieter Große Büning had been recruited, and another later published advertisement is used for decision making, which is now calculated in crucial point water was changed? And why not, a report commissioned by the court used the forerunner to the original advertisement of the solar entrepreneur Hans Dieter Große Büning was done just yet to Customer a non-recoverable savings to suggest? This opens up probably only legal experts judges and lawyers robes.
Well, one can argue that a wrong decision at first instance is easily corrected by the second instance. It would be stupid of course, if it could then have questions on what a mysterious way advertisements are changing in documents over time can. So, one could explain, at least, that the OLG Hamm has possibly made simple, and rightly says is wrong.
can now order the honor against the possibly true though, but just made defamatory allegations of fraud and graft process to be defended. Thus, since in Germany the honor of the solar entrepreneur Hans Dieter Large Büning, defended by the lawyer Dr. Hans-Jochen Gigerl and of Judge Michael Krökel by Judge Michael Krökel with the imposition of fines, imprisonment and threats of arrest against publications of the solar criticism on the Internet.
Judge Dr. Michael Krökel can be held for the best, that the difference between hot water and industrial water course for a judge who has no idea of \u200b\u200btechnology, not to comprehend simple. Nee says, since my cow, I can explain to the judge Dr. Michael Krökel simple: arises when I lay down next to a water tank, then through my warm body is hot, but I drink the water tank empty and the water heat before placing inside of my stomach, then the judge can be convinced with a simple taste test of the taste difference of the water.
0 comments:
Post a Comment