few weeks ago I told the Mountain interested public that the former president has accepted the administrative court in Kassel, Johannes Remmel a punishment for nine months on probation for possession of child pornography. The report in Focus Online, where it reported with images, is also a 4800 euro fine on the German Child Protection Agency of the question. Noting that there is also, Johannes Remmel was with 1010 child porn Bilddateien und zwei Videos auf seinem Computer erwischt worden, die Mädchen und Jungen unter 14 Jahren bei sexuellen Handlungen mit anderen Kindern, Erwachsenen oder an sich selbst zeigen würden, ist der Herr Nun-Ex-Gerichtspräsident aus der Sache wirklich gut rausgekommen. Eine Geschichte, die die Bergvölker dieser Welt interessiert, ist das aber erst geworden, nachdem Johannes Remmel über seinen Anwalt Gerhard Strauch deutsche Webseiten zensieren ließ , die über die Straftat des Gerichtspräsidenten berichten. Gerhard Strauch hat nun auch hier im Meierhof-Blog mal vorbeigeschaut und mir eine lustige E-Mail geschrieben:
rae-strauch@t-online.de to Helmut
Mein Mandant für Dr. John Remmers
your Internet publication at meierhof.blogspot.com
"Meierhof's view of the Alps, Sunday, 9/9/2007" Ex-President Dr. John Remmers court may no longer comfortable "together with all of this again given texts and commentaries and ending with "said the cow, since no one need wonder if an artist in Germany, how to write musician in the band Slime nasty texts on justice of the German judiciary."
Mr yard,
show in the above matter we have addressed the mandate for Dr. Remmel. As we take your word on the Internet, are already well informed about the law.
We urge you therefore,
the above text, comprising remove an identifying reporting from the Internet, the alternative in respect of our clients with complete anonymity and make future to refrain from identifying any reporting.
The place you have identified so-called reporting, that is, making note of the full name (or acronym) of our clientele is legally inadmissible, as they significantly violated the general right. Only for serious crimes at the time of sentencing an identifying coverage permitted (Constitutional Court Judgement of 5.6.1973, NJW 1973, 1226, 1229/1230). Against our client was on 09.01.2007 has given a punishment, so that a serious crime is not available, regardless of your hand, from a personal assessment.
After a conviction, mainly occurring at the end of six months (OLG Hamburg, Judgement of 10.2.1994 NJW? RR 1994, 1439, 1441), an identifiable reporting is generally prohibited. The rehabilitation of the affected interest is paramount (Constitutional Court Judgement of 6.5.1973 NJW 1973, 1226, 1230;. Erman, BGB, Anh § 12 para 178, 218, 223). Present case, this is all the more, as with an identifying reporting stigmatization, social exclusion, and pillory effect is connected (BGH VI ZR 259/05 v. 11.21.2005 paragraph 13;. Erman, BGB, Anh § 12 para. 214).
We see a corresponding rise and make a statement in which you
a. confirm all items with identifying reporting and publication of the picture take without delay from the Internet, anonymous but at least this,
b. to refrain from identifying any future reporting and publication of images,
until 11.25.2007 contrary.
We encourage you further in the aforementioned period is, subsequent to remove in relation to our clients insulting and defamatory text from the Internet:
"If no talent He studied law. Jura is the specialist for custom fraudsters who want to learn tricks on how to cut off the ears of others without being punished. This situation is observed at Marburg University every day a thousand times. There may be exceptions. But they are rare. "
Sincerely
Gerhard Strauch
lawyer and
lawyer specializing in administrative law
As would my cow almost the milk turned sour, they had to laugh. My cow was so free and have the attorney Gerhard Strauch from Wiesbaden now written a response:
Subject: Your funny letter to Meierhof
Dear Gerhard,
thanks for your amusing letter to the editor. Your humor is really stunning. So that the interested public has mountain to laugh at what I like to have published your letter in the farm area blogs. As any comic German courts have ever decided to censor the Internet is sometimes just as entertaining as they are the warnings of third-rate German lawyers.
I like to add the original report to the farm-blogs on a picture of you and John Remmel. Can you help out, perhaps with a pretty picture?
When Dr. Remmel is sensed by the word "habit cheats" personally addressed, then understand I well why he feels so comfortable in Marburg. As Chairman of the Industrial Court Church in the diocese of Fulda he makes it just as good as you as an advocate of Hessian conscientious objectors.
see my pleasure to forward to our future correspondence and remain
with a warm
Moo Cow by Meierhof
, then I am curious if Gerhard Strauch now a photo for imaging of the contributions to the farm blog at meierhof.blogspot.com , meierhof.wordpress.com and meierhof.blogsome.com sent. But of course that would be nice if there are any other readers would, of times a picture of John Remmel oder Gerhard Strauch rüberschickt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment